He practiced law to support his growing familyhe eventually had five. Two of the most prevalent claims for the book of mormon are, there is much archaeological proof to the book of mormon, and the american indians are descendants of israelites who came to america as described in the book of mormon. Non mormon archaeologists speak on book of mormon evidence. The book of mormon and archaeology, illustrates items mentioned in the book of mormon that were anachronisms when the book was published in 1830 but have since been discovered to be factual. When they say directly support, they typically mean that they are looking for a direct corroboration, such as the presence of the name nephi or zarahemla in association with. John dehlin august 12, 2011 apologetics, best of mormon stories, book of mormon, johns favorites, top 10 truth claims, top 100 204 comments. These carvings give incredible archaeological evidence and testify to the world that the resurrected jesus christ did come to the western hemisphere in 34 a. Archaeology, relics and book of mormon belief deseret news. In fact, several mormon organizations have been founded in order to prove these very presuppositions. Numerous observers have suggested that the book of mormon appears to be a work of fiction that parallels others within the 19thcentury moundbuilder genre that was pervasive at the time. Five compelling archeological evidences for the book of mormon. Matheny at the 1984 sunstone theological symposium in salt lake city.
A contemporary mormon view is that these civilizations rose and fell in mesoamerica. Nonmormon archaeologists speak on book of mormon evidence. Book of mormon archaeology and anthropology byu studies. T he book of mormon is advertized by the church of jesus christ of latterday saints as another testament of jesus christ and specifically of the account of his supposed visit to the american continent the book of mormon, 3 nephi 11. Sunday attended sunday school and afternoon service in hawthorne hall, and was a speaker at each assembly. However, there exists no credible archaeological evidence to support the notion that the book of mormon is a record of highly literate ancient american people of hebrew descent. The factitious unsupported idea that someone else wrote the book of mormon. Aug 01, 2007 use this book as your guide to the remarkable similarities between ancient mesoamericans, and the peoples of the book of mormon. Jerald and sandra tanner, archaeology and the book of. Hugh nibley, the book of mormon as a mirror of the east, improvement era 51 1948, pp.
Archaeology research in precolumbian americas and the book of mormon. It is really neat that scholars have found the three letters nhm on an altar from a temple called baran. Undeniable archaeological evidence of the book of mormon. The factitious unsupported idea that joseph smith, alleged to be an ignorant man, wrote the book of mormon 2. The first archaeological support for the book of mormon.
The book of mormon describes a ditch being dug around the protected area. Oh, there will be discoveries like on the arabian peninsula. This list compiled by john clark as part of his presentation debating the foundations of mormonism. I couldnt possibly cover every book of mormon correlation in one sitting. It is a common claim by critics that there is absolutely no archaeological evidence to support the book of mormon. New evidence for the book of mormon name sariah 1 nephi 2. One of the most competent and helpful evaluations of book of mormon archaeology is a paper delivered by brigham young university archaeology professor raymond t. All opinions, speakers and presenters represent and express their own individual opinions, and not necessarily the opinions of firm foundation, book of mormon evidence, or its employees, and no information or opinions represent the church of jesus christ of latterday saints. How a mormon lawyer transformed archaeology in mexicoand. See more ideas about archaeology, book of mormon and mound builders.
Dec 02, 20 i was wondering if there is any archaeological evidence to support things mentioned in the book of mormon such as wheat, barley, copper, and steel in america. Such information may yet be discovered, but not discovering it is just as likely given the lack of cultural continuity and toponyms, as well as the epigraphic and iconographic uncertainties. Mills, chief archaeologist of ohio, with the book of mormon may 20, 1917. There is absolutely no archaeological evidence to directly support the book of mormon or the nephites and lamanites, who were supposed to have numbered in the millions. Archaeological and historical evidence where did the. Hi, a friend sent me an article from meridian magazine called. Book of mormon archaeology general discussions mormon. Instead, he offers positive support for the book of mormon in multiple areas, including the placing of metal records in stone boxes and the.
However, there exists no credible archaeological evidence to support the notion that the book of mormon is a record of highly literate ancient american people of. Archaeology is in fact, physical evidence that supports the truthfulness of a historical event. Undeniable archaeological evidence of the book of mormon in north america. The book of mormon is really there so one can have book of mormon studies, and archaeology is really there so one can study archaeology, but the two are not wed. This volume features articles on archaeological and anthropological aspects of the book of mormon, such as the use of the wheel in ancient america, hagoth and the polynesian tradition, the mulekites, ancient writing in the americas, and the use of metal. Jan 23, 2016 the book of mormon describes a ditch being dug around the protected area. We can hardly be sure of its referent substance in the book of mormon when steel in the king james.
The book of mormon, on the other hand, is a much different story when we take the time to examine statements from most scholars, historians, and archaeologists who have taken the time to study the mormon scriptures to evaluate their claims of historical accuracy. Discussion regarding the historicity of the book of mormon often focuses on archaeological issues, some of which relate to the large size and the long time span of the civilizations mentioned in the book. People keep saying that mormonism isnt true because of this. Most scholars reject the idea of viewing the book of mormon as a historical record. A cautionary tale is the failed cluff expedition of 1900, which, assuming a hemispheric model of book of mormon geography, traveled from provo as far as colombia looking for the city zarahemla. Michael coe an outsiders view of book of mormon archaeology. Is there archaeological evidence for the book of mormon. The book of mormon describes three migrations of people from the middle east to america.
Undeniable archaeological evidence of the book of mormon in. The scientific legacy of a quest to prove the book of mormon. It bears all the hallmarks of what has been astutely called the tanners bizarre editorial style. Archaeological trends and the book of mormon origins byu.
It appears that the book of mormon had no place in the new world whatsoever. Jan, 2016 undeniable archaeological evidence of the book of mormon in north america. Is there archaeological evidence to support the book of mormon. Archaeology, relics, and book of mormon belief by john e. Dr john clark discusses several issues critics have brought up with the book of mormon, and shows how archaeology now shows the critics to be wrong. After careful prayer and study, i have come to the conclusion that we will never know the locations of the book of mormon. In the paper revisiting sariah at elephantine, neal rappleye, a research project manager here at book of mormon central, explains that scholars have identified a jewish woman named. Book of mormon thought false by lds memberarchaelogist. It seems misplaced endnote 20, continuing from endnote 19 in part 2.
When they say directly support, they typically mean that they are looking for a direct corroboration, such as the presence of the name nephi or zarahemla in association with ancient american archaeological data. Use this book as your guide to the remarkable similarities between ancient mesoamericans, and the peoples of the book of mormon. At least they are not wed in reality since no book of mormon location is known with reference to modern topography. Biblical archaeology can be studied because we do know where. Archaeology itself can be divided and subdivided into numerous disciplines. A journal of latterday saint faith and scholarship.
Mar 10, 2020 archaeology supporting the historicity of the book of mormon. Welcome to the book of mormon archaeological forum. Such information may yet be discovered, but not discovering it is just as likely given the lack of cultural continuity and toponyms, as well as the. Archaeological evidence and the book of mormon fairmormon. Listen and or watch the author presenting a supporting perspective of the book of mormon and why it all happened in eastern north america. Those who make claims that there is no archaeological evidence supporting the book of mormon are right in one respectwe dont know where the cities mentioned in the book of mormon are located.
Its origin and development, byu publications in archaeology and early history, no. As we begin to explore mormon archaeology, it seems appropriate to introduce the fascinating history of thomas ferguson, an attorney by trade, whose true passion manifest as an amateur archaeologist who dedicated decades of his life to the search for evidence to validate the book of mormon as a historical record. Though argument does not create conviction, lack of it destroys belief. Many also are unaware of some rather surprising new discoveries supporting the book of mormon which have been brought about by the advanced methods of science. The factitious unsupported idea that the book of mormon was plagiarized from other books. There is no archaeological evidence for the book of mormon. If the book of mormon is really true history, then even after 1500 years, there should be some evidence that would support the truthfulness of those historical scriptural events, as recorded in the book of mormon. In fact, several mormon organizations have been founded in order to prove. Archaeological science versus claims of the book of mormon. With new and exciting insights, pages full of thoughtful comparisons, and compelling illustrations, decoding ancient america will capture the interest of anyone curious about book of mormon archaeology. Fascinating evidence continues to come to light supporting a north american book of mormon geography. He shows unique slides of what modern day archeologists have found not necessarily of the lds faith. Book of mormon evidence in american archaeology wayne may.
The lay mormon is told by the mormon church that archaeology continues to. Archaeology itself can be divided and subdivided into numerous. Places, names and events that you always thought were peculiar will come alive in this commonsense lecture. In the last chapter we saw that the bible is reliable, being textually pure and verifiably accurate in many places. He established the new world archaeological foundation, where his role as. They have discovered no evidence that supports the book of mormon in any way. October 1st is the anniversary of a little known event in early church history that i believe, in consequence of significant research progress, now deserves recognition for identifying a region of major book of mormon lands and for initiating book of mormon archaeological historicity research. Sorensons theory is detailed in his book, an ancient american setting for the book of mormon, op. Lehite archaeology comes with an even greater handicap because their history probably takes place in a humid climate, and may even have modern cities built over the ancient ones with no recognition of the treasure that lies beneath.
Book of mormon evidence by an archaeologist youtube. Dec 12, 2007 the lay mormon is told by the mormon church that archaeology continues to confirm the book of mormon, while mormon scholars, who actually study archaeology for a living, have something quite. It just doesnt seem to fit anything in anthropology or history. Atop it a fence of timbers was planted and bound together with vines. Jan 18, 2018 well stop supporting this browser soon. Is there archaeological evidence to support the book of. The volume has long invited scrutiny from all branches of science. Supporting evidences of the book of mormon are broadly identifiable.
These traditions truly conflict with the book of mormon, the word of god, so the heartland model can be. Critics frequently like to compare the lack of archaeological support for the book of mormon with what they are certain is voluminous. Matheny reports his conclusion that scientific evidence does not support the theory of a new world setting for the peoples and events chronicled in the book of mormon. The purpose of this article and the one to follow is to sketch a few vivid examples of changes in how some latterday saint scholars view the book.
Archaeology has much to offer as a scientific means of gathering independent evidence of the book of mormons authenticity. Mormon traditions would have us believe that the book of mormon took place in the heartland and in new york. If the book is accurate, archaeologists would expect to find numerous pieces of hard evidence in central america that confirm the presence of these societies. In this post i wanted to emphasize physical evidencesstuff you can touch, see, feel. This compilation of groundbreaking book of mormon articles is selected from over fifty years of lds scholarship published by byu studies. Could this be evidence of a real book of mormon place name, nahom.
Smithsonian archaeologists see no direct connection between the archaeology of the new world and the subject matter. In a times and seasons editorial, october 1, 1842, the prophet joseph smith, after progressive study. Civilizations of their magnitude and duration would be expected to leave extensive archaeological records. Wells jakeman, the ancient middleamerican calendar system. Since the publication of the book of mormon in 1830, mormon archaeologists have attempted to find archaeological evidence to support it. Archaeological and historical evidence evidences of the.
Early argumentsmade at a time when the book of mormon remained virtually unreadwere greatly flawed by insisting on trumpedup slanders that dismissed joseph smith as a lazy liar with a host of even more serious flaws. Parallels of the hopewell culture as described by william c. Hopewell culture 300 bc to 400 ad of north america to book of mormon. North america this presentation and slide show will discuss parallels between the hopewell culture of north america and the nephite culture of the book of mormon. The lay mormon is told by the mormon church that archaeology continues to confirm the book of mormon, while mormon scholars, who actually study archaeology for a. Although archaeology does not currently allow an assessment of book of mormon population counts, it is important to recognize that mesoamerica was the most densely populated spot in the americas and had millions of inhabitants, 27 an order of magnitude that supports the general plausibility of book of mormon demography.
Fascinating evidence continues to come to light supporting a north american book of. The factitious unsupported idea that joseph suffered from a mental illness. Archaeology and the book of mormon is a vintage tanner publication. Unresolved issues of the books historicity and the lack of supporting archaeological evidence have led some adherents to adopt the position that the book of mormon may have been the creation of smith, but that it was nevertheless divinely inspired. Wayne may presents the supporting evidence for the heartland model, that the book of mormon nephites and jaredites lived in north america. Therefore, the mormon can have confidence that the bible is the word of god and that it can be accurately translated.
1157 733 1348 1074 636 1003 1033 1269 499 1095 1389 1146 1529 903 774 169 297 788 1560 458 1036 765 1074 431 977 526 971 828 421 1153 426 1308 1553 1138 198 62 945 1118 1240 628 1187 878 352 1345 1356 200 612 1195 1478